OUR OBJECTIVE

Our immediate objective is to halt the recommendations arising out of the independent review panel process. The panel’s report includes recommended ‘reforms’ that would:

  • Import political ideology into the practice of law, via a requirement that the disciplinary body abide by the “principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi”. Consequently individual lawyers would be required to also conform to “treaty principles”,

    and
  • Destroy professional independence by establishing a new disciplinary structure for the profession, which would be controlled by the government (via appointments to be made by the Minister of Justice),

    Obviously then, the achievement of these goals would amount to an existential event for the New Zealand legal profession… and for New Zealand society - if we are to remain within the classic classification of those countries that are ‘first world nations’.

We need your support - to challenge NZLS

In order to have the recommendations of the independent review panel scrapped, we are asking for your generous support of our effort, with your donations being easily made and gratefully accepted here.

We intend to launch High Court judicial review proceedings as to the independent review panel report process and such actions that the NZLS takes in furtherance of the report’s recommendations.

The Committee believes that the report process is clearly reviewable, in that the NZLS:

  • Exercised its powers inconsistently with the purpose of performing its lawful functions,
  • Breached the Bill of Rights Act, by failing to uphold lawyers’ rights to freedom of belief, conscience and expression, and
  • Breached its obligations to uphold the Rule of Law.

    A draft statement of claim has been prepared and is presently being refined.
join the cause

You need not be a lawyer to join and support the cause

Everyone is very welcome to join us in this important cause. The NZLS’s action against the profession affects not only lawyers, but also people who use their services - and society in general. We know that you want your lawyer to be unconflicted in representing your interests – rather than being bound to also adhere to ‘treaty principles’ which might well conflict with your interests.

WHO IS LEADING
THE RULE OF LAW COMMITTEE?

Gary Judd KC

Gary Judd engages in litigation and advice, principally in areas of civil and commercial law, administrative law, copyright and other intellectual property, and taxation. He has had numerous appearances in the courts of New Zealand including many in the Privy Council whilst it was New Zealand’s final appellate court.

He was the Chairman of the ASB Bank from 1988 to 2011 and also chaired the Ports of Auckland for three years. In January 2012 he concluded a three-year term as a New Zealand Prime Ministerial appointee to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) where he became a co-chair of the ABAC Advisory Group on APEC Financial System Capacity Building.

Gary has written diligently to raise concern amongst the legal profession about the highly-flawed process NZLS has set in motion. Several of his opinion pieces can be found here.

Stephen Franks

Stephen Franks is director of Franks Ogilvie, a law firm specialising, inter alia, in Administrative Law, has served on several boards and was a member of Parliament for the Act Party for six years.

He’s been a member of the Securities Commission, the Council of the IOD, and the NZ Stock Exchange’s Market Surveillance Panel. In 2009/10 he served on the Minister of Energy’s expert advisory group on the electricity market structure.

He advised the New Zealand Dairy Board on the route to the creation of Fonterra, the Ministry of Commerce in drafting the Electricity Industry Reform Act, Telecom New Zealand during its privatisation and initial international public offering and the World Bank on legal aspects of corporatisation and privatisation.

We need your support - subscribe here!

Everyone is very welcome to join us in this important cause.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

RLC

This website is owned and managed by the Rule of Law Committee Ltd.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
 2023 The Rule of Law Committee